Monday, 08 December 2008

  • A brit gets it, why don't the democrats?

    This is a cross post from Facebook and Xanga so there may be a duplicate either on xanga or on Facebook depending if everything works right or not.

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/article5299010.ece

    I would like to point out that that is in fact a brit newspaper and a brit writer, making valid, coherent, rational arguments as to why an armed society is a better society.

    Its also interesting the comment about the current state of brit society, how an armed robbery would be less unusual than an armed individual walking the streets. This bit of commentary can be applied to the US citizenship as well, especially those from the denser (yuk yuk) metropolitan areas. Those of us who cherish freedom and our rights would do well to contemplate effective ways of reaching these terrified people.

    How horrible it must be! To fear an object, an object that without, our very freedom would be unobtainable, I simply have difficulty imagining it. These are people who need help and enlightenment!


    Exit question: What degree of freedom can one have while not being armed, or owning a firearm?

  • Choose Identity

  • Give eProps (?)

  • New! You can now edit your comments for 15 minutes after submitting.

Who recommended?